Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Skip to main content
Advertisement
Search Results for “ci

Public Notice # 2399 – NOTICE OF PROPOSED TAX INCREASE – SRC Schools

NOTICE OF PROPOSED TAX INCREASE The Santa Rosa County School District will soon consider a measure to increase    its property tax levy. Last year’s property tax levy:  Initially proposed tax levy……………………………………… $75,203,939         Less tax reductions due to Value Adjustment Board and other assessment changes………………………………  $  ($289,137) Actual property tax levy………………………………………     $75,493,076 This year’s proposed tax […]

Public Notice # 2397 Notice of Public Meeting – SRC Development

NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FOR A TEXT AMENDMENT UPDATING THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR TRANSMITTAL TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY The Santa Rosa County Zoning Board and Board of County Commissioners will conduct public hearings to consider text amendment updating the Santa Rosa County Comprehensive Plan within this advertisement. The hearings are scheduled as […]

Public Notice # 2396 Notice of Change of Land Use – SRC Development

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF LAND USE AND INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE The Santa Rosa County Zoning Board and Board of County Commissioners will conduct public hearings to consider a change of land use and/or rezoning of land areas depicted on the maps within this advertisement. The hearings are scheduled as follows: Zoning Board (to […]

Save Our Soundside fights to end clearcutting

With the new Santa Rosa County land development code nearing, Save Our Soundside, an organization dedicated to ensuring quality of life in Santa Rosa, continues to increase awareness against clearcutting.

Judge rules impact fees to be ‘unconstitutional tax’

In a ruling released July 28, the State of Florida First District Court of Appeal ruled against the appeal by Santa Rosa County and the Santa Rosa County School District, which imposed an impact fee on new home construction intended to fund new schools and help with infrastructure needs. 

The ruling states that “the impact fees are, in fact, an unconstitutional tax.”

error: Content is protected.