Innocent until proven guilty?
At the heart of the controversy is the Heaton Brothers’ persistent push to build a road connecting future Makaira Ridge residents to Avalon Boulevard via Ibis Road, currently a cul-de-sac. Since the development began in 1996, this road has been a flashpoint. Over the years, the developer and residents have repeatedly agreed that access to Avalon through Ibis Road would not happen. These assurances have been reiterated in meetings and motions whenever the developer sought zoning changes.
Yet, Santa Rosa County recently approved plans that included the contested road. Residents turned out in force to oppose the construction, remind commissioners of past agreements, and voice their sense of betrayal.
The fallout has been staggering. Amid the turmoil, unknown individuals sabotaged the developer’s heavy equipment, drilling holes in the blocks of the machinery. Damage estimates range from $200,000 to $900,000. The timing of this act has cast suspicion on Ibis Road residents. Was it a rogue resident? A random act of vandalism? Either is possible. In this country, we don’t convict people based on what “could” be true—we rely on evidence. We also rely on the legal principle “you are innocent until proven guilty.”
Despite this, Commissioner Colten Wright delivered a scathing rebuke to Ibis Road residents, implying collective guilt. He stated, “I think if you have a deputy out there, they are probably going to think it has something to do with what is going on right now. Residents of Ibis Road, if it was none of y’all who did it, if it is truly no one you know, I would band together and try to find out in every way who did it to prove someone in your group is completely innocent.”
This assumption, based solely on timing, was irresponsible, and it leaves the residents thinking they have to prove their innocence. We believe Wright owes the residents an apology.
Chairman Kerry Smith, in contrast, responded appropriately, refraining from accusations without facts. However, Smith has his own challenges, including a self-admitted quick temper. To lead effectively, he must manage his emotions, maintain composure, and engage respectfully with county residents.
Respect is a two-way street. While residents addressing commissioners should remain civil, commissioners must uphold the same standard. Public forums should be spaces where everyone feels heard—not dismissed. The current setup, where speakers have three minutes to present their case without dialogue, only adds to public frustration. Commissioners may choose to respond after all speakers have finished, but they are not obligated to do so. This dynamic often leaves residents feeling like they’re speaking to a brick wall.
We envision a more inclusive atmosphere at commissioner meetings—one where the public feels valued and engaged. To those who consistently advocate for their communities: bravo! Your dedication holds commissioners accountable and inspires others to get involved. Such civic engagement is vital for a healthy county.
Finally, we urge commissioners to leave egos and tempers at the door. Leadership demands respect, humility, and approachability. Residents should feel empowered to challenge their leaders—not intimidated. We deserve better, and we expect better.